Know how your team works. Before you change it.
Clario reads how your people think together, then shows you what a new role, an initiative, or a reorg actually needs.
AI that helps you see your team.
Clario is the same conversation as Mirra, from the other side of the table. It reads how your people work as individuals and together, then gives you the picture to make the next decision on.
For a role you need to open, an initiative you need to spin up, or a reorg you're weighing.
Your People as Individuals
Each person's Signature, shared on their terms. How they think, what they're strongest at, how they operate when it's hard.
Your Behavioral Composition
How the team actually works together. Who complements whom. Where friction really comes from. What the room is missing.
The Target Profile
The attributes an opportunity actually needs, mapped against who you already have. Where the team covers it, and where it doesn't.
What a Change Would Do
How a hire, a move, or a restructure shifts the chemistry. Before it happens, not after.
Fit, Not Guesswork
Same attributes and same language as the person on the other side. Nobody translates. Nobody performs.
See the team. Name the need. Get the profile.
No survey. No org chart. Just talk.
See Your Team
Each person's Signature and the dynamics between them. How they think, and how they think together.
Talk About What's Next
An objective. A role. An initiative. A reorg. Clario listens the way Mirra does, and asks what the opportunity actually needs.
Get the Target Profile
The attributes that matter for this opportunity, mapped against who you already have. Where the team covers it, and where it doesn't.
This isn't a survey. It's not a scorecard.
Not a personality inventory
No types. No quadrants. Clario reads behavior from real work, in the same standardized framework Mirra uses, so people are legible without being boxed in.
Built on what people chose to share
A Signature reaches a team only when the person says so. Nothing is inferred behind anyone's back, and nothing is unverified.
Fair to the person on the other side
The criteria a team needs to see and the criteria a person wants to be seen for are the same list. Both sides look at the same thing.
Two people or two hundred
The engine is the same at any size. The dynamics just get bigger.
Questions, answered.
Clario is the team side of Introve. Where Mirra helps an individual see how they think and work, Clario shows a team how its people work as individuals and together, and what a new role, an initiative, or a reorg actually needs from them.
It runs on the same engine as Mirra and speaks the same language, so what a person builds in Mirra is what a team sees in Clario. Same attributes, same words.
A Behavioral Composition is the team-level picture: how the people on a team think, where their strengths overlap and where they don't, who complements whom, and where friction really comes from.
It isn't a chart of titles or reporting lines. It's built from each person's Signature and the patterns between them, so it describes how the team actually operates, not how it's drawn.
Neither. Clario doesn't score candidates against a rubric, and it doesn't watch anyone work. It reads Signatures that people built themselves, in conversation, and chose to share.
What it gives a team is a target profile: the attributes an opportunity actually needs, mapped against who's already in the room. That's a picture to decide with, not a verdict.
You talk to Clario about what's next. A role you need to open. An initiative you need to spin up. A reorg you're weighing. Clario listens the way Mirra does, asking about the objective and the constraints instead of handing you a template.
From that, it assembles the attributes the opportunity depends on and maps them against your team's Behavioral Composition. Where the team covers it, and where it doesn't, is where the decision starts.
No. A person's Signature reaches a team only when they say so. Nothing is pulled from an individual's conversations behind their back, and nothing unverified makes it into the team's picture.
That was a design decision, not a setting. Teams need to be effective and people need to be seen, and Clario only works if both sides trust what they're looking at.
Two people or two hundred. The engine is the same. The dynamics just get bigger, and so does the value of seeing them before you change something.
Talk to us. Clario is rolling out with teams directly, and the best first step is a conversation about the decision you're facing: the role, the initiative, the reorg. We'll show you what Clario would see.
Still have questions?
You already know your team is more than an org chart.
The things that make a team work don't show up in titles. They show up in how people think through the problem nobody scoped, and how they show up when it gets hard.
Clario doesn't just see it. It shows you what to do with it.