Know how your team works before you change it.
Your team is wider and more mixed than it was a year ago, and each person needs something different from you. Clario shows you how they actually work.
Lead the people, not just the work.
Clario starts with the Signatures your people built in Mirra and chose to share. It shows you how each person thinks, how to communicate with them, and what they value.
It gives you the understanding that used to take years of working side by side.
Your Team Intelligence
When someone joins a team, Clario reads their Signature in the same terms as everyone else's, so each person's key behaviors and pitfalls can be seen side by side. That is how you see where strengths overlap, where they leave gaps, and what each person needs from you, which no set of individual profiles can show on its own.
Your People, as They Actually Work
Each person's Signature, shared on their terms, shows how they think, how to communicate with them, and what they value.
Team Conversations
Clario hosts retros and planning sessions where everyone works through the question on their own first, so the room reasons from what people actually think.
A Profile of the Need
Clario describes what a project, initiative, or reorg requires and maps it against who you have. It describes the work, never an ideal person.
What a Change Would Do
See how a new project, a move, or a restructure would shift the team before you make the change.
Sound familiar?
Pick the situation closest to yours.
You are spinning up a new initiative.
You are pulling together people who have not worked together before, and there is no time for the get-to-know-you period. You need to know how they think and where the friction will be before the first real deadline.
What Clario does
Read the group before it meets.
Each person's Signature shows how they think and what they need, before anyone has to guess.
Map the work against the people.
Clario describes what the initiative requires and shows where this group covers it and where it does not.
See what the change would do.
Run the proposed roster through Clario before committing it, so you see how the group shifts before anyone is moved.
Start with everyone's reasoning in the room.
The kickoff runs on what each person actually thinks, not on who talks first.
What you walk away with
A team that knows how it works together from the start, instead of after deadlines have slipped or things have gone sideways.
Clario is not an assessment, a survey, or a scorecard.
It is not a personality inventory
There are no types or quadrants. Clario reads behavior from real work, in the same framework Mirra uses, so people are legible without being boxed in.
It does not infer skills from your tools
Clario does not read tickets, commits, or calendars and guess at the reasoning behind them. How someone thinks only surfaces in conversation.
It is built on what people chose to share
A Signature reaches a team only when the person says so. Nothing is inferred behind anyone's back.
It uses the same list on both sides
What a team needs to see and what a person wants to be seen for are the same attributes, in the same words. Nobody has to translate themselves.
Questions, answered.
Clario is the team side of Introve. Mirra helps a person see how they think and work; Clario shows a team what it has and what the work in front of it needs. Both run on the same engine and use the same language.
It is the team-level picture: how the people on a team think, where their strengths overlap or leave gaps, and which perspectives are not being heard. It is built from each person's Signature, so it describes how the team actually operates rather than how it is drawn.
The thinking happens in Mirra and the synthesis happens in Clario. Before a retro or a planning session, each person works through the question with Mirra on their own. Mirra is private, so people are honest and candid in a way they rarely are in a group. Clario then brings that reasoning together, so when the team meets, everyone's perspective is visible rather than only the loudest person's.
This is what Clario was built for. As organizations flatten, senior people inherit teams that span early-career hires and people with decades of experience, and each needs different leadership. Clario shows how each person works and what they need from you, without the months of observation nobody has anymore.
Clario is for the decisions you make about a team: who to put on a new initiative, how to onboard someone, what a role needs before you open it, what a retro or an engagement survey is actually telling you, and how to lead a group that is wider than it used to be. It runs on Signatures people built themselves and chose to share, and on conversations that stay private in Mirra. Nothing is pulled from anyone's tools, activity, or calendar.
You talk to Clario about what is next: a project to staff, an initiative to spin up, or a reorg you are weighing. Clario asks about the objective and the constraints, assembles the attributes the work depends on, and maps them against your team.
You can, and you will learn a lot. What you will not get is the team layer. When a Signature is shared with a Clario team, Clario maps it against the full skills taxonomy to surface that person's key behaviors and pitfalls, and then reads every Signature on the team together. Overlaps, gaps, and the friction between two working styles only show up at that level, and that analysis only runs inside Clario.
No. A Signature reaches a team only when the person says so. Nothing is pulled from their conversations behind their back. Teams need to be effective and people need to be seen, and Clario only works if both sides trust what they are looking at.
Clario is in beta. To get started, reach out and tell us about the team you are managing.
Still have questions?
You already know your team is more than an org chart.
What makes a team work does not show up in titles. It shows up in how people think through the problem nobody scoped.
Clario makes that visible, in the language your people used to describe themselves.